Sanjeev Arora: Potential changes to STOC/FOCS: report from special FOCS session

As Boaz advertised, FOCS had a panel-led discussion on “How might FOCS and STOC evolve?” Here is a summary of that session by Sanjeev Arora: -------------------- This blog post is a report about a special 80 min session on the future shape of STOC/FOCS, organized by David Shmoys (IEEE TCMF Chair) and Paul Beame (ACM Sigact … Continue reading Sanjeev Arora: Potential changes to STOC/FOCS: report from special FOCS session

Applied mathematicians vs Theoretical Computer Scientists

[Guest post by Anna Gilbert, who is co-organizing with Piotr Indyk and Dina Katabi a FOCS 2014 workshop on The  Sparse Fourier Transform: Theory and Applications, this Saturday 9am-3:30pm]  After reading Boaz's post on Updates from the ICM and in particular his discussion of interactions between the TCS and applied math communities, I thought I'd contribute a … Continue reading Applied mathematicians vs Theoretical Computer Scientists

FOCS/STOC: Protect the Venue, Reform the Meeting

by Boaz Barak and Omer Reingold ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The debate about the future of FOCS/STOC has been long and heated. A wide range of criticism (containing at times contradicting complaints) was answered with one simple truth: FOCS/STOC have played and still plays an invaluable role for the TOC community. Indeed, the authors of this proposal have … Continue reading FOCS/STOC: Protect the Venue, Reform the Meeting

Sum of Squares: Upper bounds, lower bounds, and open questions

[Note: As I commented on Omer's touching post, I too was shocked by the sudden closure of the amazingly successful MSR Silicon Valley lab. I hope that this blog, whose contents had very little to do with MSR itself and everything to do with the great group of people that was there, would continue to … Continue reading Sum of Squares: Upper bounds, lower bounds, and open questions